The 120-45-PTC - Self Assessment Rule
- Mar 4
- 2 min read
Step 1: The Macro Check (The 120 Test)
Look at the total marks for the Group (out of 150). This determines the level of "repair" needed:
Total > 120: You know the subject matter. Your failure is likely due to Speed (not finishing the paper) or Presentation (losing marks on steps). Focus on writing practice.
Total 100–120: You have a foundation but lack depth. You need a structured Revision of the entire syllabus.
Total < 100: There are major conceptual gaps. You should Redo the classes or study the material from scratch.
Step 2: The Micro Check (The 45 Test)
Apply this to each individual subject to prioritize your study schedule:
Score 45+: You are safe here. Maintain this with periodic mock tests to improve Presentation.
Score 35–45: You are "almost there." Identify the chapters that pulled your score down and Revise them intensely.
Score < 35: This is a "danger zone." Treat this subject as a fresh start and Redo your concepts.
Step 3: The PTC Quality Audit
For every subject where you scored below 50, ask yourself these three questions to fix the "Leak":
P (Presentation): Did I provide clear working notes, or did I only focus on the final answer? (Step-marking is vital).
T (Time): Did I leave questions unattempted? If so, you need to solve 2 papers under a 3-hour timer every week.
C (Concept): Did I actually understand the "Why" behind the provision, or did I just memorize it?
Action Plan to succeed
The "Little by Little" Rule: Don't try to master a whole subject in a day. Break it into small charts and mind maps to make retention easier.
Read-Think-Write:
Read the question slowly to catch the "tricks."
Think about the structure for 30 seconds.
Write fast to ensure you complete the 100 marks.
Summary for the student:
If you were not able to clear in the attempt, don't just "study more"—study differently.
Use these tests to find out if your problem is
Communication (Presentation),
Speed (Time), or
Knowledge (Concept),
and then work to improve the PTC meter for success
It's incredibly validating to see someone else describe the 120-45-PTC self assessment rule exactly the way I experience it. I've genuinely been searching for content like this, and your post hit the nail on the head. Taking a step back, I can't stress enough how much I agree with your breakdown of this self-assessment https://www.abc.net.au/news/ For me, it’s the way you articulate the nuance of that middle ground that truly resonates. It would be so valuable to see the 120-45-PTC self broken down further by different demographics; I’m curious how age or profession might influence these perceptions. This whole piece has helped me tremendously, so kudos to you for putting it out there. The depth here truly justifies sharing it…
This is so well said! You've captured the essence of the 120-45-PTC self-assessment rule perfectly. It’s exactly as you describe it; that moment of honest reflection can be surprisingly tough, but also incredibly rewarding. From another angle, I’ve been pondering the scalability of this approach too https://www.esafety.gov.au/ Can we truly apply it consistently as our lives and responsibilities grow, or does its effectiveness diminish? Honestly, I'm copying some of your key points for my own notes, as they resonate deeply. As a side note, I genuinely believe the 120-45-PTC self is such an underrated subject, often overlooked in favor of more external validation. I had a remarkably similar experience with it last year when trying to pivot my career; it…
This post on the 120-45-PTC self-assessment rule is fantastic! It really resonates with my own journey. Honestly, looking back now, if I could do anything differently regarding my own 120-45-PTC self, it would be to embrace this structured approach much sooner. I've stumbled through so many beginner pitfalls, often feeling completely lost, so your guide is a breath of fresh air and a truly reliable resource https://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/ I particularly appreciate the practical angle you take; it’s not just theory, but actionable advice. Everything you've outlined lines up perfectly with my experiences, validating so many of my own hard-won lessons. I’m definitely adding this to my 'read later' folder to revisit. Perhaps a comparison framework for different self-assessment tools within the…
This kind of content truly makes a tangible difference, and honestly, hats off to you for putting it out there. It's so refreshing to find well-articulated insights that resonate so deeply. I've actually reached very similar conclusions about the 120-45-PTC self assessment rule independently, which is both validating and a bit surprising! One area I feel could be further explored, though, is the before and after perspective https://www.osko.com.au/ Seeing concrete examples of how applying this rule has transformed someone's approach or outcomes would be incredibly powerful. It's like you're missing that visual of the problem and then the solution in action. What do you think could be improved about how the 120-45-PTC self is currently taught to better incorporate that…
Wow, this breakdown of the 120-45-PTC self-assessment rule is incredibly insightful! I've been mulling over how this concept might extend beyond the specific scenarios you've discussed. It really resonated with me because it instantly brought to mind my own experiences navigating similar self-evaluation processes https://www.bpay.com.au/faqs For instance, when I was trying to decide on a career change, I found myself constantly revisiting similar internal metrics, trying to balance what felt right with what was practical. The depth of your analysis here is truly appreciated, and the way you've presented the data supporting your points makes it so much easier to grasp. I’m definitely copying some of your key takeaways for my own reference; this is valuable stuff for anyone looking…